A joint investigation by The New York Times, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, and Der Spiegel, uncovers how Uyghur labor transfers outside Xinjiang complicate global efforts to prevent forced labor.
For years, China’s Xinjiang region has drawn global scrutiny over its treatment of the Uyghur Muslim minority. As detailed by The New York Times, Chinese government policies in the region have included mass detentions and intense surveillance, turning Xinjiang into a worldwide symbol of human rights abuses and forced labor.
In 2021, the U.S. Congress responded by banning imports from Xinjiang to combat these abuses. Yet Beijing has developed ways to circumvent these restrictions. One key mechanism: relocating Uyghur workers to factories across China.
A joint investigation by The New York Times, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, and Der Spiegel reveals a previously unknown scale to these state labor programs. The movement of Uyghurs is not merely geographic; it redistributes workers into factories serving some of the world’s top brands, often escaping the scrutiny of supply chain auditors and customs officials.
The findings highlight a critical gap: while the U.S. and EU have passed laws to block goods tied to forced labor, tracing products made outside Xinjiang remains a significant challenge.
Estimates suggest tens of thousands of Uyghurs are involved. While Chinese authorities describe the programs as voluntary poverty-alleviation efforts, activists and experts argue that Uyghurs are pressured to accept these assignments. This is seen as part of Beijing’s systematic effort to tighten control over a historically resistant minority.
The Chinese government frames the dispersal of Uyghur labor as a strategy to combat chronic poverty in Xinjiang. But rights advocates counter that these workers often lack real freedom to refuse the jobs, a hallmark of forced labor patterns already documented in the region.
Legally, the situation presents profound implications. Under the U.S. Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, imports from Xinjiang are banned unless companies can prove they are free of forced labor. But tracking goods linked to Uyghurs moved elsewhere in China creates logistical and administrative hurdles.
The issue goes beyond U.S.-China trade tensions. The Trump administration had already accused China of unfairly profiting from exploitative labor. Now, multinational companies face the risk that their goods could be seized by U.S. customs if connected to forced labor, while new European regulations add another layer of complexity.
Senator Marco Rubio, a lead author of the 2021 U.S. law, stressed the urgency of closing legal loopholes that allow unethical labor practices to slip through unnoticed. Europe is preparing similar rules, set to take effect in 2027.
The investigation also illuminates how these labor transfers operate in practice. Using public statements, corporate announcements, state media, and social media posts, researchers mapped the scale of these programs. Images show Uyghur workers lining up at train stations, tightly controlled by authorities, while factory security staff confirm that Uyghurs were sent through government-arranged programs.
More than 100 companies appear to receive Uyghur workers or their products, placing global brands in a precarious position. They face not only legal risks but also reputational damage, especially as consumers increasingly demand ethical transparency.
Experts emphasize that Uyghur workers have little choice in these relocations, with dissent potentially leading to severe consequences — in a region where even possessing a Quran can result in detention, defying labor assignments carries heavy risks.
While the economic incentives of these jobs may seem appealing against a backdrop of limited opportunities, the working conditions and quality of life remain deeply questionable.
Globally, companies must now navigate a legal minefield. Components produced in Chinese factories, possibly with Uyghur labor, are exported worldwide, including to India, Indonesia, Mexico, Europe, and North America. For businesses, the challenge is to ensure clean supply chains or face blocked shipments and sanctions.
At the heart of this issue is a fundamental clash between China’s economic ambitions and international human rights standards. Global brands must make a critical choice: ensure their supply chains are free from exploitative labor or shift production away from China to maintain market trust and avoid legal penalties.
Keep Independent Journalism Alive
In a world flooded with noise, independent journalism is more vital than ever. We work hard to bring you clear, accurate, and unbiased international news — free from corporate or political influence.If you believe in the power of honest reporting, please consider making a donation. Every contribution, big or small, helps us stay independent and keep the world informed.
Support us via PayPalYour support makes a difference.
